<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bryan Murley - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-86d799bc" type="application/json"/><link>http://bryanmurley.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:55:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Failed banks by state visualization</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/28/failed-banks-by-state-visualization/#comment-22425696</link><description>I could not keep my eye out from your article as it contains many precious information that have been unknown to many people.Thanks for sharing such nice information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">creditrepair38</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;CatholicGoogle&amp;#8221; has got to be some kind of trademark violation, right?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/01/03/catholicgoogle-has-got-to-be-some-kind-of-trademark-violation-right/#comment-22245787</link><description>I received a list of sites to study and I decided that a “Catholic Search Engine” that only searched these sites would be useful. It kind of grew from there.if you’re interested in walling off the Internet from a certain set of religiously minded patrons, that’s fine.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">watchmovies73</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:23:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failed banks by state visualization</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/28/failed-banks-by-state-visualization/#comment-22245654</link><description>Thanks for sharing interesting post..I could not keep my eye out from your article as it contains many precious information that have been unknown to many people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">watchmovies73</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failed banks by state visualization</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/28/failed-banks-by-state-visualization/#comment-20395052</link><description>thanks a lot for your valuable sharing ,right from the beginning till end it was really very informative .i can witness the experience and steps you have taken to accomplish this wonderful work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jasdhkjash</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:22:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failed banks by state visualization</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/28/failed-banks-by-state-visualization/#comment-19854968</link><description>I don’t find it very comforting that there’s like a world of people who don’t agree with my feelings about my own show, but that’s okay with me. Like, I don’t have to feel good about that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Managed_Hosting</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:25:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Catholic Google name changed</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/01/19/catholic-google-name-changed/#comment-18260499</link><description>The Chinese do it... not that I condone this kind of filtering - I currently believe, though I could be wrong, that if no opinions are suppressed the truth will become obvious (Eg Wikipedia). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;note I found your website by searching for google content violation. We all have standards on what we expect to find when searching for content, especially if safe search has been activated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am looking forward to checking out the kind of filtering they are implementing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardbaxter</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:12:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s 2nd Press Conference - Semantic Network Analysis</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/25/obamas-2nd-press-conference-semantic-network-analysis/#comment-17849731</link><description>great post , really good perspective on the subject and very well written, this certainly has put a spin on my day, many thanks from the UK and keep up the good work</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dentalimplants</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:19:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Random Ideas: The Unicorn Chaser sidebar (new feature!)</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/01/08/random-ideas-the-unicorn-chaser-sidebar-new-feature/#comment-17849696</link><description>great post , really good perspective on the subject and very well written, this certainly has put a spin on my day, many thanks from the UK and keep up the good work</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dentalimplants</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:18:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failed banks by state visualization</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/28/failed-banks-by-state-visualization/#comment-16961899</link><description>thanks for a lovely share with us. I could not keep my eye out from your article as it contains many precious information that have been unknown to many people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kadjsakdh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:09:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NYT threatens Boston Globe?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/04/07/nyt-threatens-boston-globe/#comment-16925969</link><description>Being a new blogger, I would like to tell you that you have given me much knowledge about it. Thanks for everything&lt;br&gt;regards&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="dofollow" href="http://www.searspartssite.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;sears parts&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john191</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failed banks by state visualization</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/28/failed-banks-by-state-visualization/#comment-16616718</link><description>Nicely done by the author. Keep this type of job in future as well</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cheap Ladders</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:09:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama&amp;#8217;s 2nd Press Conference - Semantic Network Analysis</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/25/obamas-2nd-press-conference-semantic-network-analysis/#comment-16616545</link><description>Nice work done by you. but u can also share this with others on blogs &amp; can get feelings &amp; opinion of others</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blogs Idea</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:01:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The only profession?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/06/10/the-only-profession/#comment-16616429</link><description>This article has unique contents &amp; also shows nice effort of the author. thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Free Blogs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:56:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspaper industry woes deconstructed</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2008/08/05/newspaper-industry-woes-deconstructed/#comment-16569101</link><description>Good thanks...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khfjdhflk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:01:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Failed banks by state visualization</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/03/28/failed-banks-by-state-visualization/#comment-16499283</link><description>All this on the tax payers money!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.premierhealthcareonline.com/" rel="follow" rel="nofollow"&gt;affordable health care &lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affordablehealthcare</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:34:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;CatholicGoogle&amp;#8221; has got to be some kind of trademark violation, right?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/01/03/catholicgoogle-has-got-to-be-some-kind-of-trademark-violation-right/#comment-16187234</link><description>Look, if you’re interested in walling off the Internet from a certain set of religiously minded patrons, that’s fine. But you can’t use the name of a company to brand your particular form of Internet censorship. Not only does CatholicGoogle use Google’s name, but they co-opt their distinctive color scheme as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks and Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kzdhfkjldsh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:44:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The missing parts of daily journalism</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/08/20/the-missing-parts-of-daily-journalism/#comment-16165670</link><description>Hi there!&lt;br&gt;Great post, just saw it. Tristan here from Apture, speaking with Matt at SXSW on the panel. I went through the same thinking process when we were grad students at Stanford. The sliding notes idea is a cool one, I hadn't seen it before. Sort of an inline version of Apture. Definitely check out &lt;a href="http://www.apture.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.apture.com&lt;/a&gt;, I'd be curious to hear your thoughts on how it stacks up. Basically solves the efficiency problem of making it easy enough to add quick annotations in scale, partly becuase you can use 3rd party content. Instead of writing your own curated context/background info/ "explainer" for your audience (which works great the first time but isn't scalable), Apture let's you re-use existing Wikipedia articles or other media that help readers understand the full story. Best part though is they don't leave your page. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hope this doesn't sound like marketing speak, it isn't intended to be.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the best,&lt;br&gt;Tristan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tristan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:58:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The missing parts of daily journalism</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/08/20/the-missing-parts-of-daily-journalism/#comment-15830639</link><description>Matt, thanks for the pointers. I actually had mentioned &lt;a href="http://www.collegemediainnovation.org/blog/2009/01/apture-cool-tool-for-adding-multimedia/" rel="nofollow"&gt;apture when it first came out&lt;/a&gt; but haven't kept up with it as much lately. I'll check out the follow-up post as well. thanks for reading and commenting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scmurley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The missing parts of daily journalism</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/08/20/the-missing-parts-of-daily-journalism/#comment-15799870</link><description>Good thoughts, Bryan. Did you see &lt;a href="http://www.newsless.org/2009/09/five-concrete-steps-to-improving-the-news/" rel="nofollow"&gt;my follow-up post yesterday&lt;/a&gt;? I agree that blogging can be an excellent way for reporters to offer a peek into their process without overwhelming casual readers. Regarding your question about technology and content management, have you seen &lt;a href="http://apture.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Apture&lt;/a&gt;? It integrates with many content management systems, allowing story producers/reporters to easily insert snippets from elsewhere in their stories. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apture CEO Tristan Harris, Jay Rosen and I have &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/futureofcontext/" rel="nofollow"&gt;pitched a session together&lt;/a&gt; at the 2010 SXSW Interactive Festival to talk about practical ways of introducing more of this context into media. If you're interested in this topic, you should definitely vote for our session (even if you're not coming to the conference). We've got big plans if our panel is accepted.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mthomps00</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:44:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspaper industry woes deconstructed</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2008/08/05/newspaper-industry-woes-deconstructed/#comment-15650380</link><description>LOL. reminds me of "Mad Libs"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:11:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Living without television: cut the cord on the boob tube and still enjoy quality entertainment</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/08/18/living-without-television-cut-the-cord-on-the-boob-tube-and-still-enjoy-quality-entertainment/#comment-15033644</link><description>Couldn't agree more sir. I never, ever, turn on the TV unless I'm a) really bored (yeah, like that happens often) or b) want to watch sports.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The last NCAA Basketball tourny was broadcast live on YouTube, and it was a better experience than watching on TV. Not only could I view the games in HD, but I could see any game I wanted – I wasn't limited by my basic cable geography. If they start doing this for regular games there will be no reason at all for me to every turn on a TV.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That… or TV's can start integrating with the web and I can go back to enjoying the large screen size.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joeybaker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:45:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The only profession?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/06/10/the-only-profession/#comment-10702838</link><description>To argue that the establishment clause or the free exercise clause elevates preachers to the same levels of constitutional protection that the press has embodied in the First Amendment isn't legally unsupported in years of case law we have on the subject.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:43:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The only profession?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/06/10/the-only-profession/#comment-10701742</link><description>Well, I do standup, as well as stage and closeup magic, in addition to my other duties as a journalist, and filmmaker. So, how many times am I enshrined? :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Batman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:22:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The only profession?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/06/10/the-only-profession/#comment-10701546</link><description>Journalism is a craft, not a profession. As soon as there are tests for journalists like lawyers and doctors must pass, then it will be a profession.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The only profession?</title><link>http://bryanmurley.com/site/index.php/2009/06/10/the-only-profession/#comment-10701351</link><description>Thanks for putting this together. This will be my go-to link for whenever someone tries to use that argument.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:12:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>